Befnal
3:18 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
Just as an aside during the last season at the Boleyn police were only stationed inside the stadium for 2 matches.
When you consider the lack of problems you appreciate what a good job the stewards did, which makes you wonder why the club did not insist unequivocally that they should have been retained & paid properly in the London Stadium.
|
Befnal
3:13 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
stoneman 2:57 Fri Oct 28
Not exactly true, the workaround is to station Police vans outside the stadium that allow radio contact to those inside, but you are right in that it is the fault of the stadium owners & yet another 'oversight' that makes things more difficult than they should be.
|
stoneman
2:57 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
Nothing like letting the facts spoil a good story.
The truth is that there are no radio communications in the stadium so the Police will not enter it until this is rectified, they fear that their officers would be in danger if they could not use their radios.
This equipment will be in place by the new year, this should have been in from the start and is the fault of the stadium owners and west ham for not addressing this earlier.
They are the facts.
|
Steven P
2:46 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
I thought there was an issue as to why there couldn't be old bill in the stadium? Radios or summing?
|
B6NY B
2:32 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
IF they had paid for old bill, 100% would have not been that trouble, seats and people jumping over barriers.
We saw it first time last season (since Stoke/Burnley in the champ 04) against Man City. This game had NO old bill, only stewards. For years and years we had singing 'banter, but that's it.
The police have been taken away, that's no one but the clubs fault and problems have and will now occur.
Take the police away from spurs v arsenal, Man Utd v City/Liverpool and you think the same wouldn't happen? It's NOT the fan base, it will ALWAYS be there.
|
Johnson
2:26 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
What earnings would we lose then Mr Anon?
|
B6NY B
2:25 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
stoneman 2:20 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
Its clearly fit for purpose as it was cleared by the football authorities.
Ok, il rephrase, it's not fit for segregation and that's why we have had trouble at every game.
|
franksfat&slow&wank
2:21 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
isn't it a case of us not paying for more old bill?
surely its not just this straight forward to fix?
|
stoneman
2:20 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
Its clearly fit for purpose as it was cleared by the football authorities.
|
penners28
2:19 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
missing a comma there benny?
|
B6NY B
2:17 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
makes me laugh, it's not fit for purpose. She should be fucked sacked.
|
zico
2:15 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
stoneman 1:50 Fri Oct 28
I think you are right. Can remember watching the highlights on Sportsnight and could quite clearly hear someone shout out "Fucking great goal Pikey", or something similar. Surprised they didn't ban the Club for that!!!
|
stoneman
1:50 Fri Oct 28
Re: Playing behind closed doors
|
Am I right in saying that we have a 100% record of playing behind closed doors?
5-1 vs Castilla?
|
| 
